Posted by: Regina Walton on: November 7, 2009
I thought this was an interesting article. I’ve been running on both cylinders, so I saved the link so I could post it here. The title captures it. Facebook is a friend to small businesses. You really don’t need it if you’re a large brand. However, even large brands see the value of having Facebook fan pages. If you’re a small business and you’ve got to realize that Facebook now has not just college students. Facebook now has your friends, your parent’s friends and, much to the dismay of many, your parents. The bottom line is your customers are on Facebook and they actually join Facebook fan pages.
Facebook is a virtual gathering place where people can catch up and talk. A lot of that time is spent sharing links and talking about their favorite things. If they know a business they like is on Facebook, it’s very likely they’re support it as a fan.
Here is a story from the LA Times about how this is working for one business.
Facebook becoming big friend of small businesses
Firms are building fan bases on the social networking website and using it to connect with customers.
Charles Nelson, president of Sprinkles Cupcakes, manages the Beverly Hills company’s pages on Facebook and other social media websites. (Lawrence K. Ho / Los Angeles Times / October 14, 2009)
Charles Nelson, president of Sprinkles Cupcakes, the Beverly Hills baker to the stars, doesn’t have a Facebook profile. Nelson, who works seven days a week, has no time for chatting online with Facebook friends.
But Nelson is logged on to Facebook all the time. That’s because more than 70,000 people have declared themselves fans of Sprinkles’ Facebook page, which has its own “vanity URL” at www.facebook.com /sprinkles.
Each day on the website, Sprinkles announces a secret word, such as “ganache,” or “bunny,” or “tropical,” or “love,” and the first 25 or 50 people to show up at any of its five stores and whisper that word get a free cupcake.
“On Facebook, we can ask our customers what’s the next location they want,” Nelson said. “What do they think of our next flavor? It’s an amazing way to communicate with our fans.”
Facebook is not just for friends anymore. The free social networking site — blocked in many workplaces as a potential time-waster — is increasingly becoming an inexpensive marketing tool for small businesses.
Sprinkles is among a growing number of mom-and-pop businesses taking advantage of a relatively new program on Facebook, one that allows them to claim their name, become visible even to folks who aren’t on the site, and stay in close contact with their customers. The business, in effect, can act like any other person on Facebook, posting status updates and seeing what its fans are doing.
Facebook doesn’t break out figures for small businesses but says it has 1.4 million business “pages,” with an average of 100 fans per page. Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg said in a speech in New York last month that every day, 10 million people become fans of pages. (Many of those pages are for random concepts, such as the beach, or laughter, or even one called “I don’t sleep enough because I stay up late for no reason,” which has 3.5 million fans.)
Businesses need to go where their customers are, and increasingly these days, that’s on Facebook and other social media sites, analysts say. More than 300 million people have signed up for Facebook, and half of them visit the site every day.
“Over the past two years, we’ve seen this increasing uptick in businesses realizing that their customers are on Facebook,” said Tim Kendall, Facebook’s director of monetization product marketing. “If they can create a presence in Facebook that allows customers to connect with them, it can be a way to strengthen that connection and also to find new customers.”
Plenty of other sites are also wooing small local businesses. The review site Yelp, Citysearch and a host of Yellow Pages sites are all making a push.
And typically, businesses don’t stick to one site such as Facebook. Instead, they spread their presence across the social media landscape, including MySpace, Twitter and LinkedIn. Increasingly, these sites connect with one another so that a status update on Facebook becomes a tweet on Twitter, or a blog post could be pushed out to several sites.
“Companies don’t have a lot of resources to create their own website,” said Jeremiah Owyang, a social media analyst at Altimeter Group. “Using these sites where the customers already are in their communities makes a lot of sense.”
Janet Rothstein, who runs a jewelry shop in Beverly Hills, used a company called MerchantCircle as her gateway to the online world, and she has since obtained a Facebook vanity URL for her page, where she has 63 fans. Having an online presence in so many places increases the odds that when someone searches on Google, they will find her.
Facebook is increasingly finding itself a rival of Google. It believes it can offer more relevant search results because the content is coming from people you know and trust, especially in the hotly contested field of local advertising.
“We are naturally really well-positioned to create a lot of value for local businesses,” Facebook’s Kendall said. “When you think about how you learn in the off-line world about local businesses and services, which cafe, which dentist, you learn a lot of that from the people you trust and are friends with. Facebook is able to streamline that process a bit.”
Yet Google remains the king of search, and Facebook says its pages frequently turn up in the Google search results.
That’s important, said Avichal Garg, a former Google employee who now owns PrepMe, a Palo Alto company that offers online test preparation.
His Facebook page drives traffic and sales because “it ranks well in search and people use search for companies they haven’t done business with before,” Garg said in an e-mail, noting how Facebook has brought in about 5% of his new business. “Facebook is a trusted domain so people click on it and when they see the faces behind the company name, they know we’re legitimate.”
“Having the vanity URL and presence on Facebook and Twitter really help,” Garg said.
Social media help companies take control of “the Google resume,” said Adrian Lurssen, a vice president at JD Supra, an online legal site based in Marshall, Calif. When people search for your company — or for what your company sells — you want your site to turn up in the first 10 results, or the first page Google delivers.
Nelson of Sprinkles agrees. Fans of his cupcakes (actually, his wife, Candace, is the pastry chef) shower Sprinkles with praise — and word-of-mouth buzz. Their Facebook friends all see when they comment on Sprinkles’ page. “You’re looking for customers but you’re really looking for advocates,” Nelson said. “We’ve never had paid advertising in five years of being open.”
Posted by: Regina Walton on: November 4, 2009

Are you just addicted to Twitter? Well, if so, maybe TwitterPeek is for you! This is the world’s first dedicated Twitter device. What “dedicated” means is it only sends and receives tweets.
Oh…
Um, what?!!!
Okay, I’ve got to say this is probably the most underwhelming product I’ve heard about in awhile. I just love Twitter now that there are a ton of people on it. I joined in 2007.
However, I’m a Blackberry-carrying, ÜberTwitter-addicted, multifunction sort of gal. I’m the person sitting on the bus reading through her tweets, laughing and replying. It’s better than dealing with the surly mass of humanity that lives in Manhattan. Also, using Twitter while commuting is usually both informative and entertaining because I follow some pretty smart and funny people.
However, a device that only sends and receives tweets? I’m not too sure about that. One of the things I do a lot is move on to the link sent in a tweet. If you’re using TwitterPeek, you can do that. Also, it only only allows one Twitter account. Um…okay. (Details taken from TwitterPeek’s FAQ page.)
The TwitterPeek folks base their theory that there is a market for this on the Rapleaf’s study that says 65% of tweets are sent from the web. From that, they conclude that most people are “stuck” using Twitter on the web.
But, but, but…wait! I’m NOT stuck. I’ve got Seesmic Desktop, a free-standing Twitter client, or PowerTwitter, a web-based Twitter client, running when I’m working on my computer, and that’s pretty much all of the time. That doesn’t mean I don’t have a smart phone. It simply means that I’m more likely to tweet when I’m taking a break from work than when I’m sitting in a taxi. Usually, if I’m in a taxi, I’ve got Google Maps up and running. There has got to be more numbers and research that show a need for a product like TwitterPeek.
The device costs $99, and that includes 6 months of free service. After that, it’s $7.95 a month or $199 for lifetime service.
That’s another question – is Twitter the IT service for the rest of our lives or in a couple of years will something else have taken its place? (Just the fact that I posed that question should tell you my answer.)
I just don’t know about this one. I wish them luck (and, hell, by posting this, I’m spreading the word for them.) We’ll see if it takes off. I know I just don’t have a need for something this basic.
Check out this video of Engadget’s Joshua Topolsky on Jimmy Fallon’s show. Joshua demos the TwittePeek for Fallon and his audience. Their laughter seems to indicate that they’re thinking the same thing I am about this one. However, maybe there is a demographic out there that really does need this. If you’re one of those people, I’m glad to have shared this info with you. Now get yourself to Amazon.com and happy tweeting!
Posted by: Regina Walton on: November 3, 2009
I have to admit that monetizing my blogs has always been something I wasn’t too keen to do. However, I’m in the minority on that issue.
There have been many people attempting to profit in one way or another from blogging. There is nothing wrong with that. In fact, blogging helped me realize that I did want to make my living writing and working on web-related projects. So don’t misunderstand me. I’ve got no problem with blogs that have ads on them. I’ve got no problem with bloggers being paid in their area of expertise. I have no problem with most ways bloggers now make a living from their writing.
However, I do think there is something very wrong with getting paid for reviews UNLESS you disclose that you’ve been paid. A review gives the impression that it’s an unbiased opinion based on someone trying a product or service. That’s why reviews by reputable sources are blind reviews. The business has no idea they’re being sized up. When money is exchanged for a review there your objectivity is compromised. I want to know if a reviewer got paid because, if they did, I don’t care about what they have to say. Well, it seems that many bloggers weren’t disclosing that they were being paid. This got so bad that the US government recently passed law requiring bloggers to disclose that they’ve been compensated for a review.
I think this is essential because social media is the new barber shop, hair salon or white picket fence. People would talk about the butcher or the car shop and let friends know whether to go to these businesses or not. Now online spots like blogs are the places where people talk and exchange opinions. If you’re a blogger and you’ve built up an audience that trusts you, what you have to say on a product or service has value to them. I know that a few recommendations for places I’ve written about have generated comments and probably customers for a few places. I didn’t expect to benefit financially. I just expected to spread the news of a great space, product or service. However, both bloggers and businesses realized this influence could be used for mutually beneficial profits.
Well, with the economic slow down and this new law, some of the reviewing for pay action has dried up. I say rightly so. If a company pays you to review a product or service, it’s a advertisement. You very well might really like the product or service, but I want to know that you’ve been paid to talk up something. Like it or not, you’re a paid representative when you do that and it needs to be disclosed.
It’s sort of funny to be that some people seem to be genuinely out of sorts that they’re not being readily paid to “recommend” things now. It’s sort of like the presumptuous blogger who had the nerve to try to blackmail George Smith at BlogHer 2009 to get a pair of Crocs. What the idiot blogger didn’t realize was as easily as she could bad mouth him, well, duh…he could bad mouth her. He said as much, and she slinked away. Even if the relation is reversed, it’s the same with being paid to review a product. Getting paid to talk something up or getting a pair of Crocs to not spread bad stories, is still compensation. Aren’t we glad that George stood up to this woman’s bullying? I’m also very glad that bloggers are being forced to let people know they’ve been paid to review something.
Here is a piece on the top from MediaBistro’s PRNewser’s blog. I’m glad they get it.
Blogger Complains Because Companies Want “Free” Reviews
By Joe Ciarallo on Nov 03, 2009 05:01 PM
ProBlogger, the popular blog that teaches one how to make a living off blogging, published an interesting guest post from a former beauty/fashion blogger. In the post, the blogger talks about how she was so excited to do “product reviews” and get all sorts of free stuff sent to her by companies.
She even signed an $8,000 deal with, “a large pharmaceutical company to write six posts for them to try educating readers on the benefits of their product…the only thing I had to do was to get the copy reviewed by the pharmaceutical company to ensure that I wasn’t using any medical words in the wrong way.”
But then the economy took a turn for the worse and the blogger’s freebie parade slowed down. What did she learn? People were actually asking her questions like how many unique visitors her site had and to send links of recent, relevant coverage before sending products. That didn’t work out, so the blogger got into another niche, “healthy eating and healthy lifestyles,” which she said worked out much better.
“One company (which manufactures supplements) that contacted me to send products for review also wanted to know how much it would cost to sponsor spots on my site. They actually wanted to pay to have banners on my site and not only receive a free review!” she said.
Um, free review? Companies aren’t supposed to pay publications for product reviews, or to influence them. Although it does happen. This post, in essence, sums up the difference between how media has traditionally worked: build audience/content, sell advertising against said audience/content – versus how it is unfortunately working for some bloggers: the content is the advertising.
Posted by: Regina Walton on: November 3, 2009

Well, good that I managed to find the CommonCraft.com YouTube page.
CommonCraft.com makes tutorial videos on a ton of topics. Now you can watch the videos all you want, but you can’t embed a lot of them. To learn more, watch a few.
The videos are really simple and are great for people who need to get the basics on a particular topic.
Of course, they’re also on Twitter: @CommonCraft.
Posted by: Regina Walton on: October 16, 2009
I’ve been busy, busy, busy.
This isn’t social media per se, but it’s is on technology. It’s a blog post I made over at The Next Web Asia. However, my editor botched the post and linked it to the source. I’m putting it here so that people can find it before it drops off the main page.
It’s an interesting tech development coming out of Korea.
For more of The Next Web Asia and my posts there, click here.
Counterfeit Whiskey Detectors in Korean Cell Phones
If you keep up with mobile phone technology, it’s pretty well-known that South Korea is high on the list of the most advanced nations. There is massive competition between the three carriers: SK Telecom, KTF, and LG Telecom. That keeps the industry innovating to leech customers away from the competition. That benefits the consumer. You can get a signal just about anywhere including when you’re up on the ski slopes or underground in the subway. The phones are sturdy, functional and, in many cases, multilingual. Plus, your average Korean citizen is very used to using the extended features from text messages to banking.
If you’ve been to or lived in Korea for any amount of time, you know that it’s a drinking culture. It’s expected that when your boss says “let’s go have dinner and drinks” to the staff that they go and that they drink, to excess (if the boss drinks to excess). Like many vibrant economies, there is also a love of status objects, including expensive brand name liquors.
That means you’ve got a group of people more than willing to pay exorbitant amounts of money for their expensive booze. In response, there is an industry of fake brand name liquor that has developed to rip these people off.
The problem for the South Korean government is that people taken in by this fraud aren’t paying the taxes levied on genuine brand name bottles of booze. To solve this problem, the South Korean National Tax Service is adding another level of functionality to the Korean cell phone. They’re going to have detectors that can verify whether a bottle of expensive whiskey is legit or not. The detectors are scheduled to be put into use this month. I think it’s pretty clever to craft the solution around a piece of technology that everyone in Korea uses.
This is how the detectors will solve this problem:
The plan is to attach RFID chips that contain production history data to whiskey bottles, so that anyone with a cellphone can use a plug-in scanner (which is to be stored in major bars and pubs) to see if the costly bottle of liquor he is about to order is real or bogus. National Tax Services is rolling this out to make sure they are collecting liquor taxes to the fullest. They are starting with 2 million bottles of whiskey.
Now I’m not sure who exactly gets busted here. I’m assuming it’s got to be the establishment or the liquor distributor. If someone knows what’s supposed to happen when a fake bottle is detected, let me know.
News release from the Hankyoreh (한겨레) website (in Korean): “너 가짜양주지?” 휴대전화로 판별
Source: Web 2.0 Asia
Posted by: Regina Walton on: October 2, 2009
Okay, I’m not. I’m just not a developer and they don’t need the hoi polloi contributing their non-tech critiques just yet. They seem to be getting enough flak from the developers: Killing Something Before It Even Begins
However, I went to the Google Wave site tonight, saw that and literally thought “noooooooooooo!” I’m anxious to try it. Of course, I’d have to be working with other geeky types who also had access. I still have friends who take weeks to check their email accounts.
Here is a screen shot of what I saw.

Okay, I’ve shared. Now I feel better.
G’night!
——–
November 4, 2009
And update, as of last week I’m a Google waver
Posted by: Regina Walton on: October 1, 2009
This is a great study on where advertising is going.
It’s not my work. I’m just helping spread the news.
So, again, a partial quote with a link over to the original post.
Enjoy!
IBM Study: The end of advertising as we know it
The next 5 years will hold more change for the advertising industry than the previous 50 did.
The information for this post is from an IBM global surveys of more than 2,400 consumers and 80 advertising experts … the report is titled, The end of advertising as we know it.”
Imagine an advertising world where ... spending on interactive, one-to-one advertising formats surpasses traditional, one-to-many advertising vehicles, and a significant share of ad space is sold through auctions and exchanges. Advertisers know who viewed and acted on an ad, and pay based on real impact rather than estimated “impressions.” Consumers self-select which ads they watch and share preferred ads with peers. User-generated advertising is as prevalent (and appealing) as agency-created spots.
As bait for you to click over, IBM has a report and you can download it from the Social Media Today page.
So get to clicking!
Posted by: Regina Walton on: September 28, 2009

I mostly use Firefox, and when I hit ctrl+T to open up a new window tab, I get the Google Toolbar window. It now tells you which pages you visit most often and also notes the last few pages you’ve bookmarked. Honestly, I’ve not really been paying any attention to it. But today I stopped to read the page.
What’s funny is it abbreviated one of the pages I’d booked marked. So I did a double take when it showed me that I’d bookmarked a page titled, “10 Great Tools for Tracking Men”…huh? I mean I’m single, but I’m not that desperate. At least, not yet.

The page is actually titled 10 Great Tools for Tracking Mentions of Your Brand Across the Web.
Phew.
Posted by: Regina Walton on: September 26, 2009
This is so worth reading, so I’m quoting the first section and linking you to the rest.
From ReadWriteWeb: Social Networking Use Triples from Only a Year Ago
Obsessed with Facebook? You’re not alone. The hours you spend logging on to update your status, post photos, and make comments on friends’ walls is not simply a “phase” you’re going through which will end sometime soon. It’s a ongoing trend affecting everyone these days and it has serious implications for the online advertising industry.
According to new figures from Nielsen, the amount of time spent surfing social networking and blogging sites had tripled since last year, suggesting “a wholesale change in the way the Internet is used,” says Jon Gibs, VP of media and agency insights at the company’s online division.
As of August 2009, the time spent on social networking and blogging sites accounts for 17% of the total time spent online, a number up 6% from a year ago. This change reflects a growing desire for people to stay connected with each other, communicate and share, reports Nielsen.
Click over to ReadWriteWeb for more and here is the link to that Nielsen Report.
Times are ‘a changin’.
Posted by: Regina Walton on: September 25, 2009
I’ve been saying this a lot to people. Social media allows people to step back from advertising.
It really is much more about word of mouth now. That means you want to get your message to the people and they’ll help you sell your product or service. I’m not naive. I know that for the big top tier companies they can still ride on the momentum of their size. Basically, they can continue to suck. However, for smaller companies, social media is a gold mine that they can tap into for a modest sum and market their products and services.
The problem is for big money advertising is it’s turning their industry on its head because we don’t have to listen. We can skip commercials or, if you’re like me, you can watch very little TV at all. When I do, I almost always mute the commercials or walk out of the room. Other times, I watch shows via Hulu.com and, yes, they have ads but you can choose what you want to see, and I’ve usually got multiple windows running anyway. The commercial plays, I click over to another website, I ignore it and click back over to watch the show. I remember watching TV with my parents when I was little, but I’ve never experienced anything like that since.

It’s rare that we gather around the TV or radio as a group anymore. Society along with technology has changed. I can’t say that I feel sorry for advertising though because I never liked the idea of big companies spending big money trying to trying to tell me what I needed.
Well, it looks like there is a clever investment banker here in NYC who has a knack for blending a melody with a turn of a phrase. A friend of mine Cindy Perman wrote about it today for CNBC and, yep, I’m taking it and blogging about it because I think it’s timely and it proves me right!
Ad Execs Cursing ‘Tilman the Skateboarding Dog’
To illustrate their plight, Terry Kawaja, an investment banker with a knack for a jingle, has turned his talents on Madison Avenue.You might know him best from his first YouTube sensation,“Wall Street Meltdown.”
In “Mad Avenue Blues,” set to the tune of Don McLean’s “American Pie,” Kawaja (who goes by the pen name L. McDuff) offers a toe-tapping tale of how the rise of digital media has pulled the rug out from traditional advertising.
Kawaja does a masterful job of working wonky business words like “I/O form” and “ROI” into melodic lyrics, while telling a substantive story about how Madison Avenue went from a golf-swinging, fast-car driving club to a victim of the digital revolution.
At 9 min, 21 sec, it’s a tad long, but it’s clever enough to hold your attention and soon you’ll find yourself singing along to the refrain:
Bye Bye those big upfront buys
Pitched my client who was pliant
But the pitch didn’t fly
And old ad boys were drinking martinis dry
Singing “Tech has taken us for a ride.”
Algorithms got me cross-eyed.
For me, it is a tad long as I got the point within the first minute.
However, I like it because it proves what I and many others have been saying: word of mouth is back. And thank goodness that it is because it levels the playing field a bit.

Albeo theme by Design Disease
Counterfeit Whiskey Detectors in Korean Cell Phones
The Discussion